![]() ![]() ![]() It can take thousands of dollars and several months for a researcher to independently assess the quality of a project, according to Robin Chazdon, a global forest and landscape restoration expert. Currently, no formal third-party certification or verification process exists for restoration projects. More than two-thirds of projects did not disclose how they follow up on projects or the survival rates of planted trees.Īn important caveat is that our database is based entirely on an organization’s self-reporting. For instance, nearly half did not specify the number of trees to be planted or the size of the project, and two-thirds of the projects did not disclose the species planted. ![]() Overall, we found a lack of transparency and reporting surrounding the specifics of tree-planting projects via their publicly accessible websites. Use the filters above to identify projects that match your prefered criteria. The FLR approach centers on the people that depend on the forest, aiming to restore ecological functionality while enhancing human well‐being, with a strong focus on monitoring and adapting the project to changes over time. ![]() Our list of criteria was primarily drawn from the Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) approach, widely heralded as the gold standard across the restoration sector. Rather than make an assessment (and perceived endorsement) of the quality of the projects, Mongabay’s review is based on how much information is publicly disclosed by an organization.Įxplore the whole database of reforestation and tree-planting projects at Reforestation.app. Our Reforestation Directory is built on a three-month research effort to record publicly available information on more than 350 tree-planting projects in 80 countries. We thought this would be a useful starting point for people wanting to fund reforestation, so they could identify projects that align with their interests. Mongabay has put together a directory to show whether tree-planting and reforestation projects publicly disclose the criteria that experts say are keys to success. So how can an investor or donor decide what projects to support? What kinds of questions should we be asking to assess tree-planting projects and ensure they are delivering the results they promise? Green Ethiopia, an eco-humanitarian NGO that works to reforest degraded landscapes. So, it’s always a bit more difficult to find out whether your order was actually done.” “But with tree planting, it doesn’t work that way because the thing that you ordered never gets delivered to your doorstep. “If you buy something online and you pay for it and then it never arrives, you’re going to complain,” Pieter Van Midwoud, chief tree-planting officer at Ecosia, a search engine that generates revenue to plant trees, told Mongabay. Planting trees is all the rage right now - billionaires from Elon Musk to Marc Benioff are touting the benefits of massive reforestation - but it’s hard to identify legitimate initiatives and even more difficult to figure out which are effective and can deliver on their promises. Here, we present some key questions to ask and criteria to consider when evaluating the legitimacy and effectiveness of a tree-planting project.Rather than make an assessment (and perceived endorsement) of the quality of the projects, Mongabay’s review is based on how much information is publicly disclosed by an organization.Our directory is built on a three-month research effort to record publicly available information on more than 350 tree-planting projects in 80 countries.Mongabay has put together a database to show whether tree-planting and reforestation projects publicly disclose the criteria that experts say are keys to success. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |